|
Leap of Faith at work: PEK (l), Glynis Lomon (r) photo by Raffi
|
By
Nick Ostrum
PEK is the indefatigable organizer, the mastermind, the man-of-many-hats
and -even-more-instruments, and, ultimately, the driving force behind Evil
Clown Records and the Leap of Faith collective. Just since the pandemic
began, he has released has released 19 and counting solo releases (among
them two meticulously constructed/produced 3-disc sets), two Leap of Faith
(LoF) duos with cellist and vocalist Glynis Lomon, two Metal Chaos Ensemble
releases with percussionist Yuri Zbitnov and one with Zbnitnov and bassist
Mike Gruen and one from his horn ensemble Turbulence. That is not to
mention the prolific output over just the last few years by the
aforementioned units, various Leap of Faith Sub-units including the massive
Leap of Faith Orchestra, his strings-cum-sax ensemble String Theory, his
one-off music and spoken word group Axioms, and various other projects that
have come into being, sometimes for just a brief spate of recordings and
performances, over the last few years. Many of these and future recordings
are also livestreamed and archived on the label’s
Youtube page.
Amidst all of this activity (in terms of production, about a quarter less
than PEK’s annual production over the last few years) and a day job, PEK
agreed to sit down and answer a few questions via email over the course of
March and April of this year. As you can see, PEK is deeply thoughtful
about his music and affably loquacious. Regarding the former point, he
assures me that this interview and some of his other ideas conveyed through
CD liner notes and periodic newsletters are just the beginning to a more
systematic explanation of his musical system (his “Big Idea” as explained
below) to be published on the Evil Clown website later this year. I, for
one, am very much looking forward to that. As you can see, what we cover
below is just the tip of the LoF iceberg.
-Nick Ostrum
FJB: In a discussion we had about the sheer and growing volume of your
catalog, you once mentioned that individual releases and performances
“are solutions to aesthetic problems posed by big ideas.” What did you
mean by this?
PEK: This question goes right to the meat of the matter. I have a very
specific response that will take quite a few words to relate, but hopefully
will make clear my artistic intent and the processes I use to achieve that
intent.
Free Jazz started in the late 50s or early 60s and Free Improvisation a
decade or two after that. The original players were looking for a way to
make music which does not rely solely on melodic / harmonic relationships
in a fixed harmonic rhythm and meter. Over time, a widely-practiced style
of improvisation has developed where texture has replaced the melodic /
harmonic relationships and action density has replaced regular rhythms as
the core organizing principles of the music. This is the Big Idea of the
improvisation scene from the 1950s to the present, and many musicians and
ensembles have created successful and highly varied solutions to this
aesthetic problem.
I have been a student of this approach since the early 1980s when I started
listening to Coltrane, Ornette, Art Ensemble of Chicago, Cecil Taylor,
Anthony Braxton, etc. All these artists use preplanned structural elements
or even composed Structures at least some of the time. Eventually it became
more common for ensembles to improvise without any predetermined Structural
elements, I call this kind of playing pure improvisation and it is how I
would categorize almost all my music. Merely because there is no
preplanning does not mean there is no Structure: Structure is an emergent
property of the decisions made by and the interactions between the
performers. Chaos Theory describes complex systems such as the weather or
the economy where the observable patterns are similarly emergent properties
of those complex systems.
I use set theory to think about texture. Timbre Sets are collections of
similar sounds from similar instruments (for example, sounds made by the
saxophone family of instruments or sounds made by wooden percussion
instruments). Sonority Sets are the Set of Sonorities (regardless of
timbre) available to an ensemble or a performance (combinations of
instruments and timbres). The word “Sonority” means different things to
different people and has multiple dictionary definitions, but to me it
means the overall effect of the combined sounds from the entire ensemble at
some particular point in time or across some particular duration.
In my observation, many ongoing improvisation ensembles establish a fairly
consistent Sonority Set which they use across all performances. They work
towards complete control of the selected set and refine that sound over
time. Lot’s of really great music has been achieved in this way, but in my
opinion, there is a fundamental limitation in this approach. Traditional
western music achieves Development within the environment of melodic /
harmonic relationships by melodic variation, harmonic development,
modulation, and other devices which date back centuries. Pure improvisation
must achieve Development via other means. Ensembles that make new
improvisations on the same or similar Sonority Sets every time make music
which is similar over time. Any one performance may be incredible, but the
next performance may be very like the previous one in Sonority.
To me, this limitation is overcome when the music Transforms between
distinct Sonorities over the length of the work. Skilled ensembles can
achieve these transformations within a fairly small Sonority Set by
utilizing extended techniques and having each player always focus on the
transformations to the overall unit sound. However, a path to the widest
possible world of Transformation lies in increasing the size of the Set of
musical resources as large as you can to make available a larger number of
distinct Sonorities to the Sonority Set. Over the duration of a work
following this approach, each section may be comprised of completely
different Set of sounds than any other section. Most Evil Clown albums have
at least 20 or 25 distinct movements.
So, here is my Big Idea: Assemble a huge collection of instruments and a
huge roster of musicians and take fundamentally different sections through
these resources for different projects and recordings. The idea of
Transformation focused improvisation and the associated performance
techniques are the same on different pieces of music, but the Sonority Set
is different for each performance due to the Set of resources utilized and
the resulting music is therefore different each time.
The first aesthetic problem for me individually is to learn to make as
broad a palette of sounds as possible. I play instruments from at least the
following Timbre Sets: Saxophones, Clarinets, Double Reeds, Flutes, Free
Reed Aerophones, Strings, Electronics, Electro-Acoustic, Wood, Metal, and
Membranes. Unlike in conventional Jazz, where I would not use a new
instrument until I achieved the significant mastery of the scales and
control of the sound to “correctly” navigate the chord changes with
“correct” tone, I will use new instruments as soon as I can make
interesting sounds. Anton Webern pioneered the idea of klangfarbenmelodie
in the early 1900s. Sequences of sounds from different instruments or
timbre sets are another method of decoupling Development from melodic or
harmonic Structure.
I make a distinction between naïve instruments and instruments that I have
formal training on. I studied saxophone and other woodwinds for many years
privately and at the Berklee School of Music in Boston from 89 to 91. I
play many other instruments that I have not been formally trained on which
I categorize as naïve, but this does not mean that I lack a sophisticated
understanding of how to leverage and control that instrument’s sound. An
example is the Sheng, which is an ancient polyphonic Chinese Free Reed
Aerophone. I have had a modern keyed version of one of these since 2015 and
was able to use it immediately in my bands at that time. Over the years
since, I have increased my vocabulary on this instrument dramatically
despite being largely ignorant of the ordinary use of this instrument in
traditional Chinese music. My solution to the first aesthetic problem
continuously evolves as I acquire new instruments and extend my control and
vocabulary on these instruments.
Musical instruments are systems which take in physical input and output
sound. Designers optimize the layout of instruments to achieve some goal:
For example, scale pattern, drone notes, dynamic responsiveness, polyphonic
or monophonic sound, microtonal or continuous pitch, quality of attack and
decay, or many others. In conventional jazz improvisation, the player is
supposed to understand the scales that are implied by the chord changes and
construct improvised melody which fits the harmonic motion: Pitch selection
is the most important element of the music, the sound or tone is far less
important. In my music, sound is much more important than pitch selection.
Any instrument provides immediate feedback data to the player when it
reveals what sound output results from what input. For simplicity, consider
just my woodwind instruments: Control of the sound of each instrument is
achieved by a whole group of physical inputs which act in concert. Among
these are air speed, armature position, throat position, diaphragm
backpressure, angle of mouthpiece or air stream, pressure on mouthpiece or
reed, and finally, at the end of the list, fingering. I can make dozens of
very different sounds on a woodwind without changing the finger position.
Some instruments, like a saxophone, have a huge variety of possible sounds
while others, like a foghorn, make basically one sound. To me, the
aesthetic problem of learning any new instrument to broaden my overall
Sonority Set boils down to leveraging the instrument’s physical system and
creating a mapping of the set of input techniques to the set of sounds
created.
My rhythmic concept uses Phrasing rather than strict alignment with a meter
or time signature. I can Phrase equally well to a metered or an ambient
environment with no clear beat. This rhythmic concept is transferable
across all the instruments I use, and together with the ability to make at
least a few interesting sounds on a new instrument, allows me to use most
new instruments immediately. Deciding what sound to make and when to place
it is a learned skill which stretches across all my instruments. While my
control over the new instrument improves over time, I accumulate new
vocabulary and can use the instrument for greater stretches of time within
a performance.
The second aesthetic problem has to do with ensemble organization. My DIY
record label, Evil Clown, produces recordings of my music in a bunch of
different bands. These bands are defined more by selection of Sonority Sets
than conventional bands which are defined by selection of band members. The
bands are all highly modular and have different players and instrumentation
for different sessions. Here is a list of some of my ongoing ensembles.
· Leap of Faith / Leap of Faith Orchestra – Core duet of myself and Glynis
Lomon (cello, aquasonic, voice) with various guests to make ensembles
varying in size from duet to orchestra of 25. This band dates to the early
90s and my association with Glynis a few additional years.
· Metal Chaos Ensemble – Core duet of myself and Yuri Zbitnov (drums,
percussion) with various guests. This band features metal percussion
instruments and rock elements including grooves which are not present in
the other bands. Recently, there is a stable sextet version of this band
which has created a sequence of albums.
-
Turbulence – ensembles comprised of only, or mostly horn players who may
also double percussion or electronics.
- String Theory - ensembles comprised of me with string players.
-
PEK Solo – performances by myself with or without studio construction
(overdubbing).
-
Sub-Units – performances by a small group of Evil Clown roster members
not assignable to one of the other band names.
Each of these “bands” uses a different focused subset of the total Evil
Clown resources and therefore creates music fundamentally different that
the others. I encourage the other musicians to play multiple instruments
and I make the percussion instruments in the Evil Clown Arsenal available
to the other performers. The number of different Sonorities available
within a performance increases substantially as the number of
multi-instrumentalists increases.
The third aesthetic problem concerns output. The whole system is
consciously defined to create a great deal of highly varied music which is
different in Sonority but shares the same theoretical underpinnings. I
think of my work as the collected work of all the ensembles, so I put out
on CD and on the net recordings of virtually every session. Interested
observers can trace the evolution of the ideas over time and perhaps track
back to the Big Idea.
We use a sports clock to track the elapsed duration, so each performance is
well timed to fit on a CD (typically, 70 minutes). One session produces one
CD’s worth of music, and since the music is nearly always recorded
Live-to-2 track, there is a minimum of mastering required. Typically, it
should take a week or less to record the music and put it out on bandcamp,
YouTube, and Soundcloud, to submit the recording for small run CD
production, and to do some promotion on facebook.
The final aesthetic problem in this discussion is performance. Once the
players and the instrumentation have been selected for a session, we play
the whole duration of the work continuously. Sometimes we discuss the
Sonority selection for the opening or the closing of the piece, and
sometimes certain sections have minimal preplanning (for example, recent
Metal Chaos Ensemble CDs have thematic spoken word sections drawn from
movies and literature which are recited during quieter sections). Each
performance is a specific and distinct solution to the aesthetic problem
posed by the Big Idea and constrained by the decisions made on the
specifics of the resources utilized.
----------------------------------------
FJB: How does the art of the solo performance play into this big
picture?
PEK: Solo performance constrains the Sonority Set to resources that I alone
use and to me alone as the performer. As with larger ensemble Evil Clown
sessions, the planning involves selecting sound resources from the massive
Evil Clown Arsenal and setting up the studio with these instruments to
allow rapid changes in instrumentation and therefore in Sonority.
The PEK Solo albums fall into four categories:
1) One continuous track (no overdubbing) of PEK playing one or many
instruments with or without signal processing.
2) One continuous track of PEK playing one or many instruments with a
prerecorded mix of samples drawn from the Evil Clown Catalog or specially
recorded at Evil Clown Headquarters. Solo albums from before 2020 fall into
the categories 1 & 2.
3) A Quartet of PEKs – Four continuous tracks of one PEK each playing many
instruments on each pass. Some of these use broad pallets and some use very
focused pallets.
4) An Orchestra of PEKs – Many tracks of PEKs performing on a broad section
of the Arsenal.
This system provides a framework to create solo works that are sufficiently
different from each other that I can continue to produce new work at
something close to Evil Clown’s usual production rate even while I can’t
perform with others.
------------------------------------
FJB: Since last March, you have released something like 16 solo
releases, and several duo and trio releases with a pared-down Leap of
Faith and Metal Chaos Ensemble. How has the Covid quarantine forced you
to reconsider your approach to music, which previously revolved around
a large circle of collaborators?
PEK: As described in some detail above, my basic approach to music is to
define a set of resources for a particular performance optimized for
creating transformation over time. When Covid came along I cancelled all
the sessions for groups. I caught up all my old business: web site, social
media, distribution, and the other non-musical activity required to drive
the enterprise. Then I took a month off… my biggest rest since I started up
in 2015 after my long hiatus from music making to focus on my day gig. In
mid-May 2020 I started up again, conceiving some new means of producing
some of the enormous output normally achieved by Evil Clown (described in
the previous response). In the Fall I did a huge series of solo works along
with a few Metal Chaos Ensemble sets with Yuri and Mike Gruen.
Both me and my housemate Raffi are diabetic and therefore at elevated risk
from Covid and we have been extraordinarily careful. In 2020, I did a few
duets and trios, but when the virus ramped up hard before Christmas, I
stopped everything except the solos. You can’t wear a mask and play a horn
at the same time.
While the kind of output has changed due to the virus, I don’t think I have
reconsidered my approach to music generally in any way. The set of
aesthetic problems posed by solo work is a bit different than the set posed
by ensemble work. I have simply used my existing approach to solve problems
of a specific subgroup of the whole class of aesthetic problems I work on.
In general, I consider pure improvisation to be fundamentally about the
moment. As an improviser, I predict and react to the evolving Sonority as I
make my musical statements. For this reason, I have always preferred
playing music that is performed entirely in the moment with all the players
simultaneously interacting. When I have used sampling and electronic
transformation of samples in works prior to the virus, I controlled those
premixes in real time while the performance of the live instruments is
proceeding to preserve the sense of real time decision making.
One thing that I have done, which is brand new since Covid, is to use
overdubbing and studio construction techniques to create category 3 and
category 4 performances as defined in the previous response. The studio
technique mimics the interactions between players in ensemble improvisation
with a few key differences:
· The interaction is one way. The current track reacts to the previous
tracks and not the other direction.
· The waveforms of the previous tracks are visible in the recording
software and provide definitive information about Phrasing that is
estimated and predicted in real-time ensemble performance.
· The Phrasing used on the other tracks is my Phrasing. It is super-easy to
respond to and match my own Phrasing concept.
· I plan, in advance, some instrument selections based on what has been
established in the previous tracks.
· I plan, in advance, opening and closing Sonorities in much greater detail
than in ensemble performance.
Unlike studio technique used in rock and other studio recording where one
instrument or a small group of instruments are recorded at a time and for
small sections of the overall work, I fill the room with instruments and
microphones and record the full duration of each track of the work with
many instruments serially. This is still very similar to how you perform
working in real time with an ensemble.
One impact of the Virus is it has both slowed down my production and
increased the amount of time actively spent playing. The studio
construction works (Categories 3 & 4) require at least 4 1/2 hours of
my performance compared to 70 minutes for a regular ensemble set. Those
recording sessions are stretched over days instead of concluded in the real
time duration of simultaneous ensemble performance. The Orchestra of PEKs
performances have taken as much as a month to do a single disc, since the
intermediate mixes used as a basis of samples for the premix are also
recorded over days. Since 2015, Evil Clown has generally had over 30
releases per year, instead of just over 20 achieved in 2020.
------------------------------------
FJB: To flip the question, what role do you see for improvised music
during pandemic and post-pandemic times? How has the meaning,
importance, or feasibility of creating such progressive music changed?
PEK: I see the pandemic as a stupid interruption which we simply need to
wait out. People need to experience art and some people need to make art
(myself included). The audience for pure improvisation is small, but
enthusiastic. Improvisation performance is best experienced in person – the
music is about the moment, so the audience being present in the same moment
matters to their perceptions. They can see the performance actions that
result in the Sonority produced which helps many to process such abstract
music.
I don’t see a change in the role of music or art of any kind, just a limit
on availability. When the Virus is over, live performance will resume and
the interruption will be over. One wrinkle for Evil Clown is that Outpost
186 in Cambridge where I have had a monthly residency for years may not
survive, or at least not reopen soon. While I search for reasonably priced
performance space in the new world, performances will be streamed live to
YouTube as often as I can schedule them from Evil Clown Headquarters.
Difficult music challenges public perceptions of “just what is music?”. As
with all art, the avantgarde pushes boundaries and broadens art for
everyone. This is the important role of progressive music. Access has been
interrupted, but the music continues, and its importance is unchanged.
------------------------------------
FJB: How have the temporary restrictions on live performances affected
your craft and vision?
I love Live Performance. There is a feedback loop between performer and
audience that does not occur in other music performance environments. For
me, Live Performance forces a narrowing of resources by the amount of
equipment I am willing to haul, the space available in my van, and the time
available in the venue for set up. This constraint on the Sonority Set
focuses the aesthetic problem posed to the performance.
As I have responded to some of the previous questions, different
constraints on the Sonority Set in no way change my craft or artistic
vision, it merely forces the aesthetic decision making of performance onto
a different Sonority Set.
I do miss a real audience, and look forward to performing in public again
as soon as it is safe to do so.
------------------------------------
FJB: You frequently stream your recording sessions in your studio,
creating a virtual live performance accessible via and archived on
YouTube and recording of that specific performance. I, for one, have
been mesmerized by seeing how you and Yuri Zbitnov navigate your
Arsenal of instruments in real-time. What is your objective with
offering so many points of access to the performance?
PEK: My main goal is to get my ideas on the record. When I came up in the
80s and 90s, Live Performance was how people consumed your music except for
a few CDs you might sell. Now, the internet has completely changed
everything, and people have widely different preferences on how they
consume music. Back in the day, Leap of Faith would draw a pretty good
audience for every performance, but those people would be basically the
only ones to experience it: A small group of improvisation fans in the
Boston Area. Now the internet provides worldwide exposure, so I try to get
my work on as many platforms as possible to spread my ideas as widely as I
can. It has simultaneously become much more difficult to put asses in seats
for Live Performances. Some fans are YouTube viewers, some download from
bandcamp or Itunes, some buy CDs from bandcamp, Downtown Music Gallery,
Squidco, Amazon, etc. Some fans stream on Spotify, Soundcloud or other
vendors. The way to maximize your exposure to the listener pool is to
leverage as many platforms as possible. I keep detailed records tracking
the steps I take for each release, to make sure that everything goes on
every platform. Generally, those steps for each release should be completed
within one week of performance.
------------------------------------
FJB: Way back when you released the three-disc Some Truths are Known, I considered it a sort of crown of your
recent solo explorations. Since then (July 2020), however, your solo
output has more than doubled. And, indeed, recent releases like the
dense EAI of Electrolysis, the surprisingly “jazzy” and
saxophone focused For Alto: For Anthony Braxton and the
somewhat bare and vulnerable Requiem for Raymond are each
something different from the cacophony of Some Truths. Then,
of course, you released another formidable three-disc solo exploration, Semantic Notions. How has your approach to your solo projects
evolved over the course of the quarantine and between projects?
PEK:
Some Truths are Known
took me almost two months to create. It was the first recording to carry An
Orchestra of PEKs in the name of the ensemble, but actually was a follow-up
to Schism
which was recorded very early in the pandemic before I conceptualized the
4-category system of solo works described above. After Some Truths Are Known, I did maybe 8 albums in 8 weeks in a frenzy
of Category 1, 2, & 3 releases. I used some of those releases as the
part of the sampling basis for
Semantic Notions
.
For Alto
,
Elaborations
and a few of the others are category 1 releases which are fundamentally
like my solo releases prior to 2020 in execution.
Requiem for Raymond
was performed a few hours after I learned of the death of my father in
September. It is completely different from every other offering in my
catalog in that its driver was my profound sense of loss over his passing.
Its subject matter was my grief in that moment – generally, my music is
abstract – it is not “about” anything in particular. I consider myself to
be a cerebral rather than emotional player. Usually, I do not see a
correlation between the sounds that I produce and any emotional state. For Requiem for Raymond there was almost no thinking, the sound just
poured out and I was completely drained by the end.
------------------------------------
FJB: As the pandemic abates, opportunities for collaboration are slowly
opening again. Do you have any plans to pick up where you left off,
when the Evil Clown collective was set to have its biggest year, yet?
Or, has the period of solitude and the hyper-focus on the
potentialities of solo work changed the course you see your projects
moving in the future?
PEK: I think all the players who were on the scheduled sets that were
cancelled at the beginning of the pandemic are eager for more. Evil Clown
is a very attractive opportunity for improvisers since I have structured
things in such a way as to minimize their effort. All they must do is show
up with their instruments and play – I do everything else including all the
administrative work that most musicians dislike.
I expect that Leap of Faith, Metal Chaos Ensemble and Turbulence sessions
will be scheduled at rate of 3 or 4 sessions a month. While I will continue
to do PEK Solo releases, they will probably return to my previous schedule
of 2 or 3 a year instead of 20. I miss playing with others and look forward
to resuming a full schedule with larger ensembles. My solo albums for the
last few years have typically been realized during some lull in the overall
schedule.
My housemate Raffi and I will both be fully vaccinated by mid-May. I will
open Evil Clown Headquarters to members of the roster who are also fully
vaccinated then. Some of the players, like Glynis Lomon and Bob Moores
(trumpet, guitar, electronics) are ahead of us, so there may be some duets
or trios that otherwise would be larger ensembles at the beginning of the
newly scheduled events. For the near term, I will just do Live Streaming to
YouTube shows, with Raffi running the 8-camera real-time video mix. As
mentioned above, Outpost 186 where I have enjoyed a multi-year monthly
residency, is in a dispute with the city of Cambridge and may not reappear
for a while or at all. Once we have returned the good old days of willy
nilly intermixing with people, I will find a new venue for regular public
performances if I need to.
------------------------------------
FJB:
This may be a naive question but given how much you have been recording
over the years and especially recently, it seems fitting. How do you
ensure that one album, maybe a given solo release, is not like the
others that might have come just a few weeks before? Do you enter a
session with preconceived ideas, tonal paths, or written instructions?
Are there structured aleatory elements? Or, do you simply let the
moment guide you?
PEK: My Big Idea is structured to produce a large amount of distinct works;
each is about a distinct moment in time and all the moments are necessarily
different. I am constantly acquiring new resources, either instruments or
performers, those new resources are used in an appropriate context and lead
to a session specific aesthetic problem to be solved in performance. This
is my plan, and I think that it works. Most of my fans who purchase
downloads and CDs are repeat customers… Once they find out about the music
and like something, they try something else, eventually becoming repeat
customers when they find the releases they buy all interesting and
sufficiently different from each other.
There is one very important Evil Clown project that has not really been
discussed in this interview yet, The Leap of Faith Orchestra. For this
project, I produce Frame Notation Scores that show the players instructions
made up of English language descriptions and simple symbols on a timeline
(the ensemble tracks the time on a sports clock). These works address the
aesthetic problem of how to have a large improvisation ensemble play a
concert length work without becoming total chaos. The Orchestra of PEKs
solo sessions address this same aesthetic problem from a completely
different angle. Six of these performances occurred between 2015 and 2019
and are documented in my usual places including detailed discussion on my
webpage at this URL. These are the only mature works in my catalog that involve detailed
preplanning. They are compositions with no melodic or rhythmic information
specified, designed to split the difference between composition and
improvisation – They also are designed to be performed without being
rehearsed beforehand, neatly solving the difficult logistical problems of
rehearsing a 25-player band.
There is also a body of 13 LOFO shows (25 CDs) performed at Third Life
Studios between 2017 and 2019 which were used to prepare for the scored
orchestra performances. Unfortunately, this venue had to close before the
pandemic due to unachievable increases in the rent. When that happened I
put out a box set which you can check out here. These performances do not use scores but did provide practice at
unstructured improvisations with the ensemble size from about 7 to 15. Each
show (except one) started with short 15 or 20 minute sets by small
Sub-Units of the orchestra (usually trios or quartets).
I have composed a seventh score (
Systems of Celestial Mechanics
) which I plan to mount at some point in the future… There is a lot of
advance work to do before I can do that including locating an affordable
venue, raising the ensemble, and creating the parts customized for those
players. I’d like to get this project up and running on a regular basis
again, but it is a huge amount of work for me, and I think I will focus on
smaller and medium sized ensembles for a while. Time will tell.
The Orchestra of PEKs solo albums address the same aesthetic problem as the
Frame Notation Scores for The Leap of Faith Orchestra: How to ensure music
with a really large amount of available resources does not turn into chaos
with no Development. The Orchestra of PEKs sets use an entirely different
mechanism to solve this problem: Instead of specifying activity on a
timeline, I conceived of an algorithm for the steps in the studio
construction. Following the algorithm results in a work which is
compositional, in that it is planned, while all of the sounds are still
improvised
The first step is to prepare Premixes (sometimes as long as the whole CD)
of multiple tracks with instruments from the same Timbre Set. These
Premixes have used the Timbre Sets of wood instruments, metal instruments,
hand chimes, saxophones, clarinets, double reeds, bass sounds, string
instruments and others. Next, I select several different Premixes and take
samples ranging in duration from about 30 seconds to 10 minutes. I
transform these samples on the computer by speeding up and slowing down and
moving the pitch up or down. Sometimes I build new Premixes from the
samples at this stage to create really thick textures from the samples of
the same Timbre Set. Once a set of Premix samples is prepared and selected,
I arrange the samples on to a 75 minute or so timeline in the DAW software.
This arrangement is a Density Map, where each section of the work has a
single Premix sample, a few overlaid Premix samples, many overlaid Premix
samples, or no Premix samples. Finally, I perform the full duration of the
work multiple times with different instrument sets available on each track.
The last pass or several passes are typically mostly horns. I have offered
many of the Premixes as bonus download tracks on the releases where they
were used. In addition to Orchestra of PEKs sets, I have used this
algorithmic approach with Yuri Zbitnov on
Don Quixote
, a Metal Chaos Ensemble studio duet construction, and we started a second
one last fall titled Dante’s Inferno which we will finish when we
can resume our work.
------------------------------------
FJB: That is interesting about Dante’s Inferno. I have really been
drawn to the recent Metal Chaos releases and have found Don Quixote one
of the most engaging yet. I imagine the Inferno will lend itself at
least as well to the disjointed narration and premixing.
Speaking of recent and upcoming releases, where would you suggest the
unseasoned listener just coming to the PEK catalog to start? Are there
any individual releases that you feel are more complete or compelling
realizations of your aesthetic, or maybe just a good introduction to
the Evil Clown universe?
The Evil Clown catalog is wide and deep: According to my master
spreadsheet, the total release count as of 4/6/21 is 312. The earliest
albums are from 1991 or 1992. I was very active in the Boston Improvisation
Scene with Leap of Faith and other projects from that time until 2001. I
then took a very long break to focus on my day gig: I was very busy at the
job and I preferred to lay out rather than do music with just half my ass.
I started up again in 2014, when I spent a few months digging through my
DAT tapes of performances and making a bunch of new releases from the
Archival period. In January of 2015, Leap of Faith started up again in a
quartet version with Me, Glynis, Steve Norton (reeds) and Yuri Zbitnov
(drums, perc). Very soon after that Yuri and I started Metal Chaos
Ensemble, and the other contemporary Evil Clown Ensembles followed.
So, this question is tough to narrow down to just a few titles, but here
are four good recent albums you could start with: One each from Leap of
Faith, Metal Chaos Ensemble, A Quartet of PEKs and An Orchestra of PEKs…
Leap of Faith Orchestra - The Photon Epoch (2019):
The most recent Frame Notation Score for the Leap of Faith Orchestra
performed at the Longy School of Music.
https://leapoffaith1.bandcamp.com/album/the-photon-epoch
Metal Chaos Ensemble - The Riddle of Steel (2020):
The fourth release by the stable Sextet Edition of MCE which features
spoken word interludes from movies and literature. This sextet band will be
very active again quite soon.
https://metalchaosensemble.bandcamp.com/album/the-riddle-of-steel
PEK Solo, A Quartet of PEKs - Strange Beauty Out of Chaos (2021):
This set just finished on 5 April uses the quartet concept on a very broad
palate.
https://peksolo.bandcamp.com/album/strange-beauty-out-of-chaos
PEK Solo, An Orchestra of PEKs - Semantic Notions (2021)
: A four-hour studio construction in three 80-minute movements on 3 CDs.
https://peksolo.bandcamp.com/album/semantic-notions-triple-length